Multiplicative graph
Type of partial category

In mathematics, a multiplicative graph (in French: graphe multiplicatif or neocategory in some English-language papers) is an algebraic structure in category theory. It is a generalization of an ordinary category in the sense that neither the associativity of arrow composition nor the composibility of a pair of connected arrows are assumed. While an ordinary category is a notion combining a directed graph and a monoidal structure, a multiplicative graph is a partial magma-like structure. Namely, it is a structure in one‑to‑one correspondence with the vertices of a directed graph, and each object has left and right identity morphisms, but composability is partial, and, moreover, associativity is not required.
Arrow composition in an ordinary category satisfies the following property: if arrows and
connect in the sense that
their composition
is defined, and, moreover,
and
In a multiplicative graph, however, condition
does not guarantee the existence of
within that structure without further assumptions, but if this composition exists, it also satisfies
and
When drawing a diagram for a multiplicative graph, it is almost always necessary to explicitly draw all existing arrows that play a role in the argument. For example, as shown in Coppey (1980), square diagrams in a multiplicative graph can take one of five types depending on which potential compositions in the diagram are actually defined.
This notion first appears in Ehresmann's book Catégories et structures. The French school bases its definition of sketch on the notion of a multiplicative graph, because this definition required a category-like structure that avoided redundant axioms as much as possible. This structure is the multiplicative graph, and this is a type of relaxed notion of category, such as a semicategory.
Cury studied enriched multiplicative graph. As a more general notion, there is the compositional graph, and multiplicative graphs can be seen as strongly identitive compositional graphs.
01Definition
| Total | Associative | Identity | Divisible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partial magma | Unneeded | Unneeded | Unneeded | Unneeded |
| Multiplicative | Unneeded | Unneeded | Required | Unneeded |
| Semigroupoid | Unneeded | Required | Unneeded | Unneeded |
| Small category | Unneeded | Required | Required | Unneeded |
| Groupoid | Unneeded | Required | Required | Required |
| Magma | Required | Unneeded | Unneeded | Unneeded |
| Quasigroup | Required | Unneeded | Unneeded | Required |
| Unital magma | Required | Unneeded | Required | Unneeded |
| Loop | Required | Unneeded | Required | Required |
| Semigroup | Required | Required | Unneeded | Unneeded |
| Associative quasigroup | Required | Required | Unneeded | Required |
| Monoid | Required | Required | Required | Unneeded |
| Group | Required | Required | Required | Required |
A multiplicative graph is couple formed by a set denoted by
, and a partial law of composition
on
satisfying the following axioms:
is a mapping from a subset of
(denoted by
and called the set of composable couples) into
; instead of
, we write
and we call
the composite of
.
- There exists a reflexive graph
(i.e.
and
are retractions from
onto a subset of
, denoted by
), such that:
- (existence of units): For each element
of
, the composites
and
are defined, and we have
- Here,
is the right identity of
and is called the source of
, while
is the left identity of
and is called the target of
;
- (coherence of dom/cod): If the composite
is defined, then:
From the condition 2, the reflexive graph is uniquely defined.
02Inverse morphisms are not unique
Let be a multiplicative graph, if one has a
and
(resp.
and
), then we say that
admit a right (resp. left) inverse of a morphism
in
. If there exists an
, we say that
in
is invertible such that
is the right and left inverse of
in
, then we called
an inverse of
in
. If
is a multiplicative graph and if
admit f' for right (resp. left) inverse in
, one has:
and
While inverse morphisms in a ordinary category are unique, a morphisme of multiplicative graph can have several inverse morphisms. The law of composition are shown in the table below:
| f | f' | f'' | e | e' | |
| f | e' | e' | f | ||
| f' | e | f' | |||
| f'' | e | f'' | |||
| e | f' | f'' | e | ||
| e' | f | e' |
03Example
- An ordinary category is a multiplicative graph if it satisfies the following two axioms:
- (composibility):all the couples
where
are composable (so that
is the pullback of
);
- (strong associativity):the law of composition being furthermore associative.
- For the two axioms above, a notion got by adding only the associativity axiom (that is, associativity is not strong) to a multiplicative graph, that is, a notion that an ordinary category without the composibility axiom, this is called a precategory. But, this is not standard terminology, a precategory is usually synonymous with a semigroupoid and does not require each object to have an identity morphism.
04External link
- Tringali, Salvatore (2013). "Plots and Their Applications - Part I: Foundations". arXiv:1311.3524v1 [math.CT].
- Wells, Charles (2009). "Sketches: Outline with References" (PDF).
Sources and credits
This article is adapted from the Wikipedia article “Multiplicative graph”, written by its contributors and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Fathomly has changed the layout, removed citation markers, navigation and maintenance notices, and adjusted punctuation. This adapted version is shared under the same license. For references, see the original article.
Images, from Wikimedia Commons:
- Category SVG.svg by IkamusumeFan, CC BY-SA 4.0
Fathomly is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Wikimedia Foundation. Spotted a problem? Tell us.