Reference articles on history, science, culture and more
Encyclopedia

Multiplicative graph

Type of partial category

Image credit is listed at the end of this article.

In mathematics, a multiplicative graph (in French: graphe multiplicatif or neocategory in some English-language papers) is an algebraic structure in category theory. It is a generalization of an ordinary category in the sense that neither the associativity of arrow composition nor the composibility of a pair of connected arrows are assumed. While an ordinary category is a notion combining a directed graph and a monoidal structure, a multiplicative graph is a partial magma-like structure. Namely, it is a structure in one‑to‑one correspondence with the vertices of a directed graph, and each object has left and right identity morphisms, but composability is partial, and, moreover, associativity is not required.

Arrow composition in an ordinary category satisfies the following property: if arrows f and g connect in the sense that {\text{dom}}(g)={\text{cod}}(f), their composition g\circ f is defined, and, moreover, {\text{dom}}(g\circ f)={\text{dom}}(f) and {\text{cod}}(g\circ f)={\text{cod}}(g). In a multiplicative graph, however, condition {\text{dom}}(g)={\text{cod}}(f) does not guarantee the existence of g\circ f within that structure without further assumptions, but if this composition exists, it also satisfies {\text{dom}}(g\circ f)={\text{dom}}(f) and {\text{cod}}(g\circ f)={\text{cod}}(g). When drawing a diagram for a multiplicative graph, it is almost always necessary to explicitly draw all existing arrows that play a role in the argument. For example, as shown in Coppey (1980), square diagrams in a multiplicative graph can take one of five types depending on which potential compositions in the diagram are actually defined.

This notion first appears in Ehresmann's book Catégories et structures. The French school bases its definition of sketch on the notion of a multiplicative graph, because this definition required a category-like structure that avoided redundant axioms as much as possible. This structure is the multiplicative graph, and this is a type of relaxed notion of category, such as a semicategory.

Cury studied enriched multiplicative graph. As a more general notion, there is the compositional graph, and multiplicative graphs can be seen as strongly identitive compositional graphs.

01Definition

Group-like structures
Total Associative Identity Divisible
Partial magma UnneededUnneededUnneededUnneeded
Multiplicative UnneededUnneededRequiredUnneeded
Semigroupoid UnneededRequiredUnneededUnneeded
Small category UnneededRequiredRequiredUnneeded
Groupoid UnneededRequiredRequiredRequired
Magma RequiredUnneededUnneededUnneeded
Quasigroup RequiredUnneededUnneededRequired
Unital magma RequiredUnneededRequiredUnneeded
Loop RequiredUnneededRequiredRequired
Semigroup RequiredRequiredUnneededUnneeded
Associative quasigroup RequiredRequiredUnneededRequired
Monoid RequiredRequiredRequiredUnneeded
Group RequiredRequiredRequiredRequired

A multiplicative graph \Sigma is couple formed by a set denoted by {\underline {\Sigma }}, and a partial law of composition \kappa on {\underline {\Sigma }} satisfying the following axioms:

  1. \kappa is a mapping from a subset of {\underline {\Sigma }}\times {\underline {\Sigma }} (denoted by \Sigma *\Sigma and called the set of composable couples) into {\underline {\Sigma }}; instead of \kappa (y,x), we write y\circ x and we call y\circ x the composite of (y,x).
  2. There exists a reflexive graph ({\underline {\Sigma }},\beta ,\alpha ) (i.e. \alpha and \beta are retractions from {\underline {\Sigma }} onto a subset of {\underline {\Sigma }}, denoted by \Sigma _{0}), such that:
(existence of units): For each element x of {\underline {\Sigma }}, the composites x\circ \alpha (x) and \beta (x)\circ x are defined, and we have
x\circ \alpha (x)=x=\beta (x)\circ x.
Here, \alpha (x) is the right identity of x and is called the source of x, while \beta (x) is the left identity of x and is called the target of x;
(coherence of dom/cod): If the composite y\circ x is defined, then:
\alpha (y\circ x)=\alpha (x),\ \beta (y\circ x)=\beta (y),\ {\text{and}}\ \alpha (y)=\beta (x).

From the condition 2, the reflexive graph (\Sigma ,\beta ,\alpha ) is uniquely defined.

02Inverse morphisms are not unique

Let C^{*} be a multiplicative graph, if one has a (f,f')\in C^{*}*C^{*} and f\circ f'=\beta (f) (resp. (f',f)\in C^{*}*C^{*} and f'\circ f=\alpha (f)), then we say that f\in C admit a right (resp. left) inverse of a morphism f' in C^{*}. If there exists an f'\in C, we say that f in C^{*} is invertible such that f' is the right and left inverse of f in C^{*}, then we called f' an inverse of f in C^{*}. If C^{*} is a multiplicative graph and if f\in C admit f' for right (resp. left) inverse in C^{*}, one has:

\alpha (f')=\beta (f) and \beta (f')=\alpha (f)

While inverse morphisms in a ordinary category are unique, a morphisme of multiplicative graph C^{*} can have several inverse morphisms. The law of composition are shown in the table below:

ff'f''ee'
fe'e'f
f'ef'
f''ef''
ef'f''e
e'fe'

03Example

  • An ordinary category is a multiplicative graph if it satisfies the following two axioms:
(composibility):all the couples (y,x) where \alpha (y)=\beta (x) are composable (so that \Sigma *\Sigma is the pullback of (\alpha ,\beta ));
(strong associativity):the law of composition being furthermore associative.
  • For the two axioms above, a notion got by adding only the associativity axiom (that is, associativity is not strong) to a multiplicative graph, that is, a notion that an ordinary category without the composibility axiom, this is called a precategory. But, this is not standard terminology, a precategory is usually synonymous with a semigroupoid and does not require each object to have an identity morphism.
Watch videos about Multiplicative graphExplainers and documentaries on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Sources and credits

This article is adapted from the Wikipedia article Multiplicative graph, written by its contributors and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Fathomly has changed the layout, removed citation markers, navigation and maintenance notices, and adjusted punctuation. This adapted version is shared under the same license. For references, see the original article.

Images, from Wikimedia Commons:

Fathomly is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Wikimedia Foundation. Spotted a problem? Tell us.