Reference articles on history, science, culture and more
Encyclopedia

ROSA Linux

Software distribution

Image credit is listed at the end of this article.

ROSA Linux is a Linux operating system distribution, developed by the Russian company 'AO NTC IT ROSA' (Russian: АО «НТЦ ИТ РОСА»). It is available in three different editions: ROSA Desktop Fresh, ROSA Enterprise Desktop, and ROSA Enterprise Linux Server, with the latter two aiming at commercial users. Its desktop computer editions come bundled with closed-source software such as Adobe Flash Player, multimedia codecs, NVIDIA drivers, and Steam.

ROSA Desktop Fresh 13.0, the latest desktop version, was released on 28 February 2025, and is available with four different desktop environments: KDE Plasma 6, GNOME, LXQt and Xfce. It also contains open source software developed in-house by ROSA, such as ROSA Image Writer or ROSA Media Player. ROSA Linux has been certified by the Ministry of Defence of Russia.

Although its main popularity is in the Russian language market, ROSA Desktop also received favorable reviews by several non-Russian online publications. German technology website Golem.de praised ROSA for its stability and hardware support, while LinuxInsider.com called ROSA "a real Powerhouse".

01History

ROSA originated as a fork of now defunct French distribution Mandriva Linux and has since then been developed independently. The ROSA company was founded in early 2010 and released the first version of its operating system in December 2010. It initially targeted enterprise users only, but in late 2012, ROSA started its end-user oriented distribution, Desktop Fresh. Before its bankruptcy, Mandriva developed its last releases jointly with ROSA. Mandriva 2011 was also based on ROSA. Also MagOS Linux, is based on ROSA.

02Version history

ROSA

VersionDesktop environmentRelease dateLinux kernel
2011 "Hydrogen"KDE29 August 2011, N/a
2012 LTS "Marathon"13 May 2012, N/a
Desktop.Fresh 201219 December 2012, N/a
Desktop Fresh R117 July 2013, N/a
Desktop Fresh R24 December 2013, N/a
Desktop Fresh R3KDE, GNOME29 April 20143.10.34
Desktop Fresh R4KDE, LXDE8 October 20143.14.15
Desktop Fresh R5KDE, LXDE, GNOME25 December 20143.14.25
Desktop Fresh R6KDE15 July 20153.14.44
Desktop Fresh R7 KDE 4, KDE 5, LXQt 5 January 2016 4.1.15
Desktop Fresh R8 KDE 4, KDE 5, GNOME 3, MATE 2 August 2016 4.1.25
Desktop Fresh R8.1 KDE 4 22 February 2017 4.9 LTS
Desktop Fresh R9 KDE 4, KDE 5, GNOME 3, LXQt 1st half of 2017 4.9.20 LTS
Desktop Fresh R10 KDE Plasma 5, KDE Plasma 4, LXQt 4 December 2017 4.9
Desktop Fresh R11 KDE Plasma 5, KDE Plasma 4, Xfce, LXQt 15 March 2019 4.15
Desktop Fresh R11.1 KDE Plasma 5, KDE Plasma 4, Xfce, LXQt 23 April 2020 5.4.32
Fresh 12 KDE Plasma 5 12 October 2021 5.10.71
Fresh 12.1 KDE Plasma 5, GNOME 41 12 November 2021 5.10.74
Fresh 12.2 KDE Plasma 5, GNOME 41, LXQt 14 February 2022
Fresh 12.3 KDE Plasma 5, GNOME 42, LXQt, Xfce 31 October 2022 5.15.75
Fresh 12.4 KDE Plasma 5, GNOME, LXQt, Xfce 4 April 2023 6.1.20 LTS
Fresh 12.5 KDE Plasma 5, GNOME, LXQt, Xfce 2 April 2024 6.6.47
Fresh 13 KDE Plasma 6, GNOME 28 February 2024 6.12.13

ROSA Chrome

Version Desktop environment Release date Linux kernel
12.4 KDE Plasma 5 26 April 2023 6.1
12.5 KDE Plasma 5 30 May 2024 6.6
12.6 6 November 2024

ROSA Mobile

Version Supported models Release date
1.0 R-FON 11 September 2023
2.0 R-FON 14 March 2025
3.0 R-FON 27 April 2026

03Reception

LinuxBSDos.com reviewed ROSA Desktop Fresh R2 with GNOME. He wrote:

ROSA Desktop Fresh is supposed to be the line that ships with the latest and greatest (read: bleeding edge software versions), but ROSA Desktop Fresh R2 GNOME did not live up to that billing. Instead of GNOME 3.10, the latest stable version of the GNOME 3 desktop, you get GNOME 3.8.4.

LinuxBSDos.com also reviewed same version with KDE, and have the review about earlier version , Fresh and Marathon 2012.

In October 2012, Dedoimedo wrote review about ROSA Marathon 2012:

ROSA is a fairly elegant distribution, with a simple, clean layout, a handful of posh icons, windows-like decorations, and a classy menu. All in all, you would be tempted to guess what desktop environment you're working in, as the customized KDE leans toward more Gnome-like features.

Dedoimedo also wrote review about ROSA Desktop Fresh R7.

Jesse Smith reviewed ROSA Desktop Fresh 2012 R1 for DistroWatch Weekly:

Booting from the disc brings up a menu asking if we would like to launch the ROSA live environment or run the distribution's system installer. There is a third option which is to boot from the local hard drive and I was surprised to find booting from the local drive is the default option. This makes a good deal of sense as it means if we install the distribution and forget to eject the disc (or USB thumb drive) that we will still boot into the local installation of ROSA. Opting to run the live desktop brings us to a series of screens asking us to read the distribution's license agreement, set our time zone, and confirm our keyboard's layout. From there we are brought to the KDE desktop. The theme is bright and the background is a nice, light blue. At the bottom of the display, we find the application menu, some quick-launch icons, and the task switcher. One of the first things I did was seek out the system installer and attempt to launch it. When I clicked on the system installer icon a pop-up appeared which simply said: "password invalid" and the installer closed. Given this reception, I decided to reboot the machine and try running the system installer from the live disc's boot menu.

Smith also reviewed Fresh R9 version.

Watch videos about ROSA LinuxExplainers and documentaries on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Sources and credits

This article is adapted from the Wikipedia article ROSA Linux, written by its contributors and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Fathomly has changed the layout, removed citation markers, navigation and maintenance notices, and adjusted punctuation. This adapted version is shared under the same license. For references, see the original article.

Images, from Wikimedia Commons:

Fathomly is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Wikimedia Foundation. Spotted a problem? Tell us.