Reference articles on history, science, culture and more
Encyclopedia

OS-level virtualization

Operating system virtualization paradigm

OS-level virtualization is an operating system (OS) virtualization paradigm in which the kernel allows the existence of multiple isolated user space instances, including containers (LXC, Solaris Containers, AIX WPARs, HP-UX SRP Containers, Docker, Podman, Guix), zones (Solaris Containers), virtual private servers (OpenVZ), partitions, virtual environments (VEs), virtual kernels (DragonFly BSD), and jails (FreeBSD jail and chroot). Such instances may look like real computers from the point of view of programs running in them. A computer program running on an ordinary operating system can see all resources (connected devices, files and folders, network shares, CPU power, quantifiable hardware capabilities) of that computer. Programs running inside a container can only see the container's contents and devices assigned to the container.

On Unix-like operating systems, this feature can be seen as an advanced implementation of the standard chroot mechanism, which changes the apparent root folder for the current running process and its children. In addition to isolation mechanisms, the kernel often provides resource-management features to limit the impact of one container's activities on other containers. Linux containers are all based on the virtualization, isolation, and resource management mechanisms provided by the Linux kernel, notably Linux namespaces and cgroups.

Although the word container most commonly refers to OS-level virtualization, it is sometimes used to refer to fuller virtual machines operating in varying degrees of concert with the host OS, such as Microsoft's Hyper-V containers. For an overview of virtualization since 1960, see Timeline of virtualization technologies.

01Operation

On ordinary operating systems for personal computers, a computer program can see (even though it might not be able to access) all the system's resources. They include:

  • Hardware capabilities that can be employed, such as the CPU and the network connection
  • Data that can be read or written, such as files, folders and network shares
  • Connected peripherals it can interact with, such as webcam, printer, scanner, or fax

The operating system may allow or deny access to such resources based on which program requests them and the user account in the context in which it runs. The operating system may also hide those resources, so that when the computer program enumerates them, they do not appear in the enumeration results. Nevertheless, from a programming point of view, the computer program has interacted with those resources and the operating system has managed an act of interaction.

With operating-system-virtualization, or containerization, it is possible to run programs within containers, to which only parts of these resources are allocated. A program expecting to see the whole computer, once run inside a container, can only see the allocated resources and believes them to be all that is available. Several containers can be created on each operating system, to each of which a subset of the computer's resources is allocated. Each container may contain any number of computer programs. These programs may run concurrently or separately, and may even interact with one another.

Containerization has similarities to application virtualization: In the latter, only one computer program is placed in an isolated container and the isolation applies to file system only.

02Uses

Operating-system level virtualization is commonly used in virtual hosting environments, where it is useful for securely allocating finite hardware resources among a large number of mutually-distrusting users. System administrators may also use it for consolidating server hardware by moving services on separate hosts into containers on the one server.

Operating-system level virtualization can also be used to run software created for a certain Linux distribution on another distribution, an example is Distrobox.

Other typical scenarios include separating several programs to separate containers for improved security, hardware independence, and added resource management features. The improved security provided by the use of a chroot mechanism, however, is not perfect. Operating-system-level virtualization implementations capable of live migration can also be used for dynamic load balancing of containers between nodes in a cluster.

Overhead

Operating-system level virtualization usually imposes less overhead than full virtualization because programs in OS-level virtual partitions use the operating system's normal system call interface and do not need to be subjected to emulation or be run in an intermediate virtual machine, as is the case with full virtualization (such as VMware ESXi, QEMU, or Hyper-V) and paravirtualization (such as Xen or User-mode Linux). This form of virtualization also does not require hardware support for efficient performance.

Flexibility

Operating-system level virtualization is not as flexible as other virtualization approaches since it cannot host a guest operating system different from the host one, or a different guest kernel. For example, with Linux, different distributions are fine, but other operating systems such as Windows cannot be hosted. Operating systems using variable input systematics are subject to limitations within the virtualized architecture. Adaptation methods including cloud-server relay analytics maintain the OS-level virtual environment within these applications.

Solaris partially overcomes the limitation described above with its branded zones feature, which provides the ability to run an environment within a container that emulates an older Solaris 8 or 9 version in a Solaris 10 host. Linux branded zones (referred to as "lx" branded zones) are also available on x86-based Solaris systems, providing a complete Linux user space and support for the execution of Linux applications; additionally, Solaris provides utilities needed to install Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.x or CentOS 3.x Linux distributions inside "lx" zones. However, in 2010 Linux branded zones were removed from Solaris; in 2014 they were reintroduced in Illumos, which is the open source Solaris fork, supporting 32-bit Linux kernels.

Storage

Some implementations provide file-level copy-on-write (CoW) mechanisms. (Most commonly, a standard file system is shared between partitions, and those partitions that change the files automatically create their own copies.) This is easier to back up, more space-efficient and simpler to cache than the block-level copy-on-write schemes common on whole-system virtualizers. Whole-system virtualizers, however, can work with non-native file systems and create and roll back snapshots of the entire system state.

03Implementations

Actively Maintained / Developed Implementations

Mechanism Operating system License Start of
development
Features
File system
isolation
Copy on write Disk quotas I/O rate
limiting
Memory limits CPU quotas Network
isolation
Nested
virtualization
Partition checkpointing and live migration Root privilege isolation
chroot Most UNIX-like operating systems Varies by operating system 1982 Partial
No No No No No No Yes No No
Docker Linux, Windows x64
macOS
Apache License 2.0 2013 Yes Yes Partial
Yes (since 1.10) Yes Yes Yes Yes Only in experimental mode with CRIU Yes (since 1.10)
Podman Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD Apache License 2.0 2018 Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes
LXC Linux GNU GPLv2 2008 Yes
Yes Partial
Partial
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Apptainer (fork of Singularity) Linux BSD Licence 2015
Yes
Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes
OpenVZ Linux GNU GPLv2 2005 Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Partial
Yes Yes
Virtuozzo Linux, Windows Trialware 2000
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Partial
Yes Yes
Solaris Containers (Zones) illumos (OpenSolaris),
Solaris
CDDL,
Proprietary
2004 Yes Yes (ZFS) Yes Partial
Yes Yes Yes

Partial
Partial
Yes
FreeBSD jail FreeBSD, DragonFly BSD BSD License 2000
Yes Yes (ZFS) Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Partial
Yes
vkernel DragonFly BSD BSD Licence 2006
Yes
Yes
, N/a ? Yes
Yes
Yes
? ? Yes
WPARs AIX Commercial proprietary software 2007 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
No Yes
?
iCore Virtual Accounts Windows XP Freeware 2008 Yes No Yes No No No No ? No ?
Sandboxie Windows GNU GPLv3 2004 Yes Yes Partial No No No Partial No No Yes
systemd-nspawn Linux GNU LGPLv2.1+ 2010 Yes Yes Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes Yes
? Yes
Turbo Windows Freemium 2012 Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes

Historical/Defunct Implementations

Mechanism Operating system License Actively developed since or between Features
File system isolation Copy on write Disk quotas I/O rate limiting Memory limits CPU quotas Network isolation Nested virtualization Partition checkpointing and live migration Root privilege isolation
Linux-VServer
(security context)
Linux, Windows Server 2016 GNU GPLv2 2001-2018 Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Partial
? No Partial
lmctfy Linux Apache License 2.0 2013, 2015 Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Partial
? No Partial
sysjail OpenBSD, NetBSD BSD License 2006, 2009 Yes No No No No No Yes No No ?
rkt (rocket) Linux Apache License 2.0 2014, 2018 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ? ? Yes
Watch videos about OS-level virtualizationExplainers and documentaries on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Sources and credits

This article is adapted from the Wikipedia article OS-level virtualization, written by its contributors and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Fathomly has changed the layout, removed citation markers, navigation and maintenance notices, and adjusted punctuation. This adapted version is shared under the same license. For references, see the original article.

Fathomly is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Wikimedia Foundation. Spotted a problem? Tell us.