Encyclopedia

Logical equivalence

Concept in logic

Wikipedia contributorsAdapted for Fathomly · View authors

2 min read
Source updated February 7, 2026

In logic and mathematics, statements $p$ and $q$ are said to be logically equivalent if they have the same truth value in every model. The logical equivalence of $p$ and $q$ is sometimes expressed as $p\equiv q$ , $p::q$ , ${\textsf {E}}pq$ , or $p\iff q$ , depending on the notation being used. However, these symbols are also used for material equivalence, so proper interpretation would depend on the context. Logical equivalence is different from material equivalence, although the two concepts are intrinsically related.

01Logical equivalences

In logic, many common logical equivalences exist and are often listed as laws or properties. The following tables illustrate some of these.

General logical equivalences

Equivalence	Name
$p\wedge \top \equiv p$ $p\vee \bot \equiv p$	Identity laws
$p\vee \top \equiv \top$ $p\wedge \bot \equiv \bot$	Domination laws
$p\vee p\equiv p$ $p\wedge p\equiv p$	Idempotent or tautology laws
$\neg (\neg p)\equiv p$	Double negation law
$p\vee q\equiv q\vee p$ $p\wedge q\equiv q\wedge p$	Commutative laws
$(p\vee q)\vee r\equiv p\vee (q\vee r)$ $(p\wedge q)\wedge r\equiv p\wedge (q\wedge r)$	Associative laws
$p\vee (q\wedge r)\equiv (p\vee q)\wedge (p\vee r)$ $p\wedge (q\vee r)\equiv (p\wedge q)\vee (p\wedge r)$	Distributive laws
$\neg (p\wedge q)\equiv \neg p\vee \neg q$ $\neg (p\vee q)\equiv \neg p\wedge \neg q$	De Morgan's laws
$p\vee (p\wedge q)\equiv p$ $p\wedge (p\vee q)\equiv p$	Absorption laws
$p\vee \neg p\equiv \top$ $p\wedge \neg p\equiv \bot$	Negation laws

Logical equivalences involving conditional statements

$p\rightarrow q\equiv \neg p\vee q$
$p\rightarrow q\equiv \neg q\rightarrow \neg p$
$p\vee q\equiv \neg p\rightarrow q$
$p\wedge q\equiv \neg (p\rightarrow \neg q)$
$\neg (p\rightarrow q)\equiv p\wedge \neg q$
$(p\rightarrow q)\wedge (p\rightarrow r)\equiv p\rightarrow (q\wedge r)$
$(p\rightarrow q)\vee (p\rightarrow r)\equiv p\rightarrow (q\vee r)$
$(p\rightarrow r)\wedge (q\rightarrow r)\equiv (p\vee q)\rightarrow r$
$(p\rightarrow r)\vee (q\rightarrow r)\equiv (p\wedge q)\rightarrow r$

Logical equivalences involving biconditionals

$p\leftrightarrow q\equiv (p\rightarrow q)\wedge (q\rightarrow p)$
$p\leftrightarrow q\equiv \neg p\leftrightarrow \neg q$
$p\leftrightarrow q\equiv (p\wedge q)\vee (\neg p\wedge \neg q)$
$\neg (p\leftrightarrow q)\equiv \neg p\leftrightarrow q$
$\neg (p\leftrightarrow q)\equiv p\leftrightarrow \neg q$
$\neg (p\leftrightarrow q)\equiv p\oplus q$

Where $\oplus$ represents XOR.

02Examples

In logic

The following statements are logically equivalent:

If Lisa is in Denmark, then she is in Europe (a statement of the form $d\rightarrow e$ ).
If Lisa is not in Europe, then she is not in Denmark (a statement of the form $\neg e\rightarrow \neg d$ ).

Syntactically, (1) and (2) are derivable from each other via the rules of contraposition and double negation. Semantically, (1) and (2) are true in exactly the same models (interpretations, valuations); namely, those in which either Lisa is in Denmark is false or Lisa is in Europe is true.

(Note that in this example, classical logic is assumed. Some non-classical logics do not deem (1) and (2) to be logically equivalent.)

03Relation to material equivalence

Logical equivalence is different from material equivalence. Formulas $p$ and $q$ are logically equivalent if and only if the statement of their material equivalence ( $p\leftrightarrow q$ ) is a tautology.

The material equivalence of $p$ and $q$ (often written as $p\leftrightarrow q$ ) is itself another statement in the same object language as $p$ and $q$ . This statement expresses the idea "' $p$ if and only if $q$ '". In particular, the truth value of $p\leftrightarrow q$ can change from one model to another.

On the other hand, the claim that two formulas are logically equivalent is a statement in metalanguage, which expresses a relationship between two statements $p$ and $q$ . The statements are logically equivalent if, in every model, they have the same truth value.

Watch videos about Logical equivalenceExplainers and documentaries on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Sources and credits

This article is adapted from the Wikipedia article “Logical equivalence”, written by its contributors and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Fathomly has changed the layout, removed citation markers, navigation and maintenance notices, and adjusted punctuation. This adapted version is shared under the same license. For references, see the original article.

Fathomly is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Wikimedia Foundation. Spotted a problem? Tell us.

Logical equivalence

01Logical equivalences

General logical equivalences

Logical equivalences involving conditional statements

Logical equivalences involving biconditionals

02Examples

In logic

03Relation to material equivalence

Sources and credits

Related topics

Logical consequence

Equisatisfiability

If and only if