Encyclopedia

Kleisli category

Category theory

Wikipedia contributorsAdapted for Fathomly · View authors

2 min read
Source updated March 3, 2026

In category theory, a Kleisli category is a category naturally associated to any monad T. It is equivalent to the category of free T-algebras. The Kleisli category is one of two extremal solutions to the question: "Does every monad arise from an adjunction?" The other extremal solution is the Eilenberg-Moore category. Kleisli categories are named for the mathematician Heinrich Kleisli.

01Formal definition

Let ⟨T, η, μ⟩ be a monad over a category C. The Kleisli category of C is the category C_T whose objects and morphisms are given by

${\begin{aligned}\mathrm {Obj} ({{\mathcal {C}}_{T}})&=\mathrm {Obj} ({\mathcal {C}}),\\\mathrm {Hom} _{{\mathcal {C}}_{T}}(X,Y)&=\mathrm {Hom} _{\mathcal {C}}(X,TY).\end{aligned}}$

That is, every morphism f: X → T Y in C (with codomain TY) can also be regarded as a morphism in C_T (but with codomain Y). Composition of morphisms in C_T is given by

$g\circ _{T}f=\mu _{Z}\circ Tg\circ f:X\to TY\to T^{2}Z\to TZ$

where f: X → T Y and g: Y → T Z. The identity morphism is given by the monad unit η:

$\mathrm {id} _{X}=\eta _{X}$ .

An alternative way of writing this, which clarifies the category in which each object lives, is used by MacLane. We use very slightly different notation for this presentation. Given the same monad and category $C$ as above, we associate with each object $X$ in $C$ a new object $X_{T}$ , and for each morphism $f\colon X\to TY$ in $C$ a morphism $f^{*}\colon X_{T}\to Y_{T}$ . Together, these objects and morphisms form our category $C_{T}$ , where we define composition, also called Kleisli composition, by

$g^{*}\circ _{T}f^{*}=(\mu _{Z}\circ Tg\circ f)^{*}.$

Then the identity morphism in $C_{T}$ , the Kleisli identity, is

$\mathrm {id} _{X_{T}}=(\eta _{X})^{*}.$

02Extension operators and Kleisli triples

Composition of Kleisli arrows can be expressed succinctly by means of the extension operator (-)^# : Hom(X, TY) → Hom(TX, TY). Given a monad ⟨T, η, μ⟩ over a category C and a morphism f : X → TY let

$f^{\sharp }=\mu _{Y}\circ Tf.$

Composition in the Kleisli category C_T can then be written

$g\circ _{T}f=g^{\sharp }\circ f.$

The extension operator satisfies the identities:

${\begin{aligned}\eta _{X}^{\sharp }&=\mathrm {id} _{TX}\\f^{\sharp }\circ \eta _{X}&=f\\(g^{\sharp }\circ f)^{\sharp }&=g^{\sharp }\circ f^{\sharp }\end{aligned}}$

where f : X → TY and g : Y → TZ. It follows trivially from these properties that Kleisli composition is associative and that η_X is the identity.

In fact, to give a monad is to give a Kleisli triple ⟨T, η, (-)^#⟩, i.e.

A function $T\colon \mathrm {ob} (C)\to \mathrm {ob} (C)$ ;
For each object $A$ in $C$ , a morphism $\eta _{A}\colon A\to T(A)$ ;
For each morphism $f\colon A\to T(B)$ in $C$ , a morphism $f^{\sharp }\colon T(A)\to T(B)$

such that the above three equations for extension operators are satisfied.

03Kleisli adjunction

Kleisli categories were originally defined in order to show that every monad arises from an adjunction. That construction is as follows.

Let ⟨T, η, μ⟩ be a monad over a category C and let C_T be the associated Kleisli category. Using Mac Lane's notation mentioned in the “Formal definition” section above, define a functor F: C → C_T by

$FX=X_{T}\;$

$F(f\colon X\to Y)=(\eta _{Y}\circ f)^{*}$

and a functor G : C_T → C by

$GY_{T}=TY\;$

$G(f^{*}\colon X_{T}\to Y_{T})=\mu _{Y}\circ Tf\;$

One can show that F and G are indeed functors and that F is left adjoint to G. The counit of the adjunction is given by

$\varepsilon _{Y_{T}}=(\mathrm {id} _{TY})^{*}:(TY)_{T}\to Y_{T}.$

Finally, one can show that T = GF and μ = GεF so that ⟨T, η, μ⟩ is the monad associated to the adjunction ⟨F, G, η, ε⟩.

Showing that GF = T

For any object X in category C:

${\begin{aligned}(G\circ F)(X)&=G(F(X))\\&=G(X_{T})\\&=TX.\end{aligned}}$

For any $f:X\to Y$ in category C:

${\begin{aligned}(G\circ F)(f)&=G(F(f))\\&=G((\eta _{Y}\circ f)^{*})\\&=\mu _{Y}\circ T(\eta _{Y}\circ f)\\&=\mu _{Y}\circ T\eta _{Y}\circ Tf\\&={\text{id}}_{TY}\circ Tf\\&=Tf.\end{aligned}}$

Since $(G\circ F)(X)=TX$ is true for any object X in C and $(G\circ F)(f)=Tf$ is true for any morphism f in C, then $G\circ F=T$ . Q.E.D.

Watch videos about Kleisli categoryExplainers and documentaries on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Sources and credits

This article is adapted from the Wikipedia article “Kleisli category”, written by its contributors and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Fathomly has changed the layout, removed citation markers, navigation and maintenance notices, and adjusted punctuation. This adapted version is shared under the same license. For references, see the original article.

Fathomly is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Wikimedia Foundation. Spotted a problem? Tell us.