Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration
Type of testing program by the United States military
The Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) program was a Department of Defense research and evaluation initiative for mature, advanced technology for United States military usage. These demonstrations allowed for cheaper and earlier evaluation of technology and systems than the formal acquisition process.
An ACTD must be sponsored by an operational user, with approval and oversight from the now-terminated role of Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Advanced Systems and Concepts, or DUSD(AS&C), previously titled the Deputy USD for Advanced Technology, or DUSD(AT).
The follow-on Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) program was initiated by the deputy under-secretary in 2005. The new JCTD framework emphasized multiservice technology development and improvements in planning. ACTDs were replaced by JCTDs during about a three-year span from 2005 to 2008. During 2006, the final round of ACTDs were up for selection, and in September 2006 the winning projects received their formal approval. All remaining ACTDs continued to be funded, though, and were expected to conclude by 2008.
01Lists of selected programs
The following lists of ACTDs are separated into which year they were selected and approved during.
Fiscal year 1995
| Fiscal Year | # | Title | Class* | Total Expected Cost
(1995-2003: mil, K) |
User/Sponsor | Lead Service or Agency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct. 1994
(FY 1995) |
1 | Advanced Joint
Planning |
I | 40.5m | US Atlantic | Defense Information |
| 2 | Cruise Missile
Defense, Phase I |
III | 74.2m | US Pacific | Navy | |
| 3 | High-Altitude
Endurance UAV |
II | 922.6m | US Atlantic | Air Force | |
| 4 | Joint Countermine | III | 402.1m | US Atlantic | Navy | |
| 5 | Kinetic Energy Boost-
Phase Intercept |
II | 40.0m | Air Combat | Air Force | |
| 6 | Low-Life-Cycle-Cost
Medium-Lift Helicopter |
II | 800K | Military Sealift | Navy | |
| 7 | Medium-Altitude
Endurance UAV (Predator) |
II | 128.4m | US Atlantic | Air Force | |
| 8 | Precision/Rapid
Counter-MRL |
III | 86.3m | US Forces Korea | Army | |
| 9 | Precision SIGINT
Targeting System |
I | 45.4m | US Forces Korea | Navy | |
| 10 | Rapid Force
Projection Initiative |
III | 567.8m | XVIIIth Airborne | Army | |
| 11 | Synthetic Theater
of War |
I | 174.2m | US Atlantic | None | |
| *Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems
Abbreviations:
| ||||||
Fiscal year 1996
| Fiscal Year | # | Title | Class* | Total Expected Cost
(1995-2003: mil, K) |
User/Sponsor | Lead Service or Agency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct. 1995
(FY 1996) |
1 | Air Base/Port
Biological Detection |
III | 19.7m | US Central | Army |
| 2 | Battlefield Awareness
and Data Dissemination |
I | 113.4m | US Atlantic | Defense Information | |
| 3 | Combat Identification | II | 92.7m | US Atlantic | Army | |
| 4 | Combat Vehicle
Survivability |
II | 48.6m | III Corps | Army | |
| 5 | Counterproliferation I | III | 123.3m | US European | Air Force, Defense Special | |
| 6 | Counter Sniper | II | 1.0m | US Army | Army | |
| 7 | Joint Logistics | I | 168.3m | US Atlantic | Navy | |
| 8 | Miniature Air-launched
Decoy |
II | 45.0m | Air Combat | Air Force | |
| 9 | Navigation Warfare | II | 83.4m | US Atlantic | Air Force | |
| 10 | Semi-Automated
IMINT Processing |
I | 123.2m | US Atlantic | Army, Air Force, DARPA, | |
| 11 | Tactical High-Energy | II | 117.1m | Israeli Ministry | Israel | |
| 12 | Tactical UAV program | II | 131.3m | Army, Navy, | Army | |
| *Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems
Abbreviations:
| ||||||
Fiscal year 1997
| Fiscal Year | # | Title | Class* | Total Expected Cost
(1995-2003: mil, K) |
User/Sponsor | Lead Service or Agency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct. 1996
(FY 1997) |
1 | Chemical Add-On to
Air Base/Port Biological Detection |
III | 3.2m | US Central | Army |
| 2 | Consequence
Management |
II | 3.2m | Army, Marine | Army, Marine Corps | |
| 3 | Counter-
proliferation II |
III | 303.0m | US European | Air Force, Navy | |
| 4 | Extending the Littoral
Battlespace |
III | 137.7m | US Pacific | Marine Corps | |
| 5 | Information
Operations Planning Tool |
I | 55.1m | US Central | Air Force | |
| 6 | Integrated Collection
Management |
I | 12.2m | US Atlantic | Defense Intelligence | |
| 7 | Joint Advanced Health
and Usage Monitoring System |
II | 15.5m | n.a. | Navy | |
| 8 | Military Operations in | III | 71.9m | US Special | Army | |
| 9 | Rapid Terrain
Visualization |
II | 54.6m | XVIIIth Airborne | Army | |
| *Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems
Abbreviations:
| ||||||
Fiscal year 1998
| Fiscal Year | # | Title | Class* | Total Expected Cost
(1995-2003: mil, K) |
User/Sponsor | Lead Service or Agency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct. 1997
(FY 1998) |
1 | Adaptive Course of
Action |
I | 19.3m | US Atlantic | Defense Information |
| 2 | C4I for Coalition
Warfare |
I | 20.0m | US European | Army | |
| 3 | High Power
Microwave |
II | 2.0m | US European | Army | |
| 4 | Information Assur-
ance: Automated Intrusion Detection Environment |
I | 75.1m | US Strategic | Defense Information | |
| 5 | Joint Biological
Remote Early Warning System |
III | 125.7m | US European | Army | |
| 6 | Joint Continuous
Strike Environment |
I | 15.9m | US European | Defense Information | |
| 7 | Joint Modular Lighter
System |
II | 26.5m | US Atlantic | Navy | |
| 8 | Line-of-Sight Anti-
tank |
II | 257.9m | US Central | Army | |
| 9 | Link 16 (tactical data
network for NATO) |
I | 3.3m | US Atlantic | Navy | |
| 10 | Migration Defense
Intelligence Threat Data System |
I | 11.4m | US European | Defense Intelligence | |
| 11 | Precision Targeting
Identification |
II | 23.0m | JIATF East
(Joint Inter- agency Task Force East) |
Navy | |
| 12 | Space-Based
Space Surveillance Operations |
I | 21.5m | US Space | Air Force | |
| 13 | Theater Precision
Strike Operations |
I | 93.4m | US Forces Korea | Army | |
| 14 | Unattended Ground
Sensors |
II | 20.8m | US Central | Air Force | |
| *Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems
Abbreviations: | ||||||
Although not represented in this section, additional ACTDs indeed followed those listed above (during FY 1999-2006).
02Congressional Budget Office assessments
Some of the Congressional Budget Office assessments, such as the CBO 1998 Memorandum, reviewed the ACTD program's progress since its initiation in 1994 up until the 1998 assessment. The memorandum summarized the results as "From 1995 through 1998, DoD has spent $3.2 billion on 46 ACTDs. The $3.2 billion represents about 2 percent of DoD’s entire budget for research and development during that time." The memorandum provided some details about the 46 ACTDs as of 1998, and highlighted the Medium-Altitude Endurance UAV (the Predator drone) as on its then successes, having transitioned into a formal DOD Acquisition Program.
03Outcomes
The following programs were completed under the Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration framework:
- Global Hawk
- JSTOW ACTD as part of Joint Semi-Automated Forces
- DarkStar
- JPADS
Sources and credits
This article is adapted from the Wikipedia article “Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration”, written by its contributors and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Fathomly has changed the layout, removed citation markers, navigation and maintenance notices, and adjusted punctuation. This adapted version is shared under the same license. For references, see the original article.
Fathomly is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Wikimedia Foundation. Spotted a problem? Tell us.